MISCEGENATION FOR WHITES GOOD, MISCEGENATION FOR JEWS BAD

"Intermarriage is worse than holocaust." So said Golda Meir, former prime minister of Israel, that is, until someone else said she didn't say it. Whatever. But given the circumstantial evidence - the chorus of Jewish voices singing exactly the same song, it is more than likely that it was said by the lady in question. Try this on for size: "If you or one of your friends are on the verge of intermarriage, we plead with you, do not allow a temporary infatuation to ruin your life, the lives of your dear children and help to destroy our cherished and beloved Jewish people." This was an advertisment in the Jewish Chronicle, December 1989.  How about this gem from the same publication, same period, written by Jeffry Kwinter: "A Jew is someone from Jewish stock. No-one can make a gentile Jewish. We must retain our own exclusivity in order to survive and not be infiltrated by outsiders." No shortage exists of these types of statements but the point need not be laboured. It's assumed that the general drift here is appreciated.

The sentiments being expressed can't be argued with because they are self-evidently true. How else could a unique race have remained a nation through more than two thousand years of the diapora? This "race", more correctly, is essentially a combination of two distinct groupings: the hugely predominant Ashkenazi converts with a Sephardi side serving, with only the latter being the element who put the Semite into anti-Semite. Cemented together by a religion which is more an ideology, the two ingredients, plus an admixture of "outsiders" who've slipped under the radar, think as a race. How could one fail to be impressed by this kind of tenacity and single mindedness? Only one problem though. Why is this world class ethnocentricity accepted as wholesome and necessary by Jews while at the same time foisting what they know to be a ruinous poison, that is, tsunami-like infiltration and resulting miscegenation on the West - Western Christendom - and being foremost in creating an environment in which those who aren't quite enthused about being air-brushed out of existence would in earlier times be burnt as heretics, "racists" being the new witches?



In an earlier post, the breath-taking hypocricy of Jews - the crowning glory of "chutzpa" - was touched on, as well as the mechanism making it possible. The Jewish dual morality is the escape clause. Briefly, one moral code ensures fair dealing and justice between Jews themselves. Very handily, a second moral code informs how Jews deal, with gentiles. This basically allows Jews to do to others which is forbidden to do to each other. One of the earliest godsends of this arrangement (pun intended) was that, being one of the three religions supposedly with common roots, and prohibition against usury existing amongst all three, the only difference was that with Jews the prohibition wasn't extended to non-Jews. Talk about manna from heaven! This was the golden loop-hole from which ulitmately grew fractional reserve banking - basically money created from thin air. This is the point at which those who only wanted to know where the phenomenal power of the Jews came from can stop reading.

Given that Jews make no secret of their loathing and terror of miscegenation, it is obvious they know well  its destructiveness of nations - nations in the true sense, and even nations in the modern sense which means, especially in the West, not much more than geographical descriptions. Therefore, when they champion mass immigration and multiculturalism for the West, but shy away from it themselves like vampires trying to evade sunshine, they are in no doubt about the fate of countries being drip-fed these poisons. To the Western mind, this seems egregious hypocrisy, but not to the distantly removed Jewish mentality. A semblance at least of understanding of this mentality could be achieved by appreciating that every event, every action, re-action and consequence at all affecting the Jews is seen through a prism, and that prism could be labeled "is it good for the Jews?" This is the only test, the only criterior for deciding what is morally good - no dicking around with such formulaes as "the greatest good for the greatest numbers".  Seen in this way it's possible that no contradiction at all exists in Jewish minds between no mixing for Jews and mega-mixing for whites because they are both good for the Jews. The former will protect the Jewish nation while the latter will destroy white nations, or Christian nations as the Jews see them, and which have been feared and despised by Jews for the last two thousand years.



Of course Jews haven't explicitly called for miscegenation in the West; they've simply engineered the situation conducive to it: mass immigration of radically different races into the homelands of whites. Nature of course take care of the rest, particularly given the lack of discrimination inherent in the male libido. It's the people who don't understand this, for example, who lean toward the theory that no funny business took place between Neanderthals and Cro Magnon man, and who would probably shudder at the thought of Neanderthal ghosts still walking among us.

In Australia, for instance, the process of miscegenation is well advanced, a veritable perfect storm of miscegenation occurring: the complementarity between  white men and brown South East Asian women. Australian men, traumatised by feminism and intimidated by orders for the perfect man being placed by not so perfect women on dating sites, are finding what once was plentiful in white women. With ultra feminine women who are not stridently assertive, their confusion and sense of loss is being assuaged. Conversely, the women they are discovering are themselves looking or men who are men and not prospective door-mats. Colour is of course no problem here as the majority of men have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the leftist point of view on race, that is, that no such thing exists - and Asian women who, on the contrary,  are exquisitely race conscious, see the production of offspring a lighter colour than themselves as a definite plus. After all it is no accident that skin whiteneing products are flying off the shelves in the darker parts of Asia. It doesn't hurt either that the prospective white husband has a lot more earning power than men back in the home country, where, in addition, is exactly where they might be headed on failing to snare a husband here.



With the Chinese flooding into Australia, the situation is a little different. When speaking of Chinese, it is usually the Han who constitute the overwhelming majority of the Chinese population being referred to.Being equipped with surfeit of racial pride (that is, "racism" when applied to whites) and clannishness, these are less inclined to intermarriage. This shouldn't be surprising given that they are descendants of those who once populated the Middle Kingdom, meaning the very centre of the world. It was a unique hubris that caused the decline of the Middle Kingdom. Believing they had attained social, cultural and political perfection, any change whatsoever could only be viewed as a retrograde step and thus eschewed and so they stagnated and ossified. This of course gave Europeans an opportunity to overtake and then subject the Chinese to more than a century of humiliating conquest and colonisation. This is not forgotten by these erstwhile defeated people as they rapidly go about repositioning themselves at the centre of the world.

Some uncanny similarities exist between the Chinese and Jews. Foremost is the love of money and devotion to its accumulation. Material success and its resulting power are positioned highly in the value sytems of the two people. Similar to the Jews never ceasing to be Jews no matter where they live, the Chinese never stop being Chinese regardless of changing religious or spiritual values or length of exile from the homeland. This characteristic of the Chinese should be reason alone for authorities (if they were really serious about the national interest as they are alway carping on about in their typical lying manner) to be deeply concerned about the onrush of Chinese immigration. A fifth collumn grows like Topsy and in the event of any disagreement or conflict with China, prizes need not be handed out for guessing on which side "our" Chinese will be.

The Chinese taboo against intermarriage (with inferiors) appears to be relaxing. The sprouting of Chinese-Australian children will be slower than South East Asian-Australian children, but then again the Chinese are well on their way to becoming a towering majority among Asians in Australia so it can be expected that one day Chinese-Australians will be a signifiant bi-racial minority - behind a pure Chinese majority.

The supreme irony in all this is that, to the eventual disappointment of the idiot, liberal-minded, egalitarian stooges lusting for "a Eurasian Australia" as a dead but not missed Australian Governor General once did, a racial hierarchy will remain in place. As amply demonstrated in countries such as India, Brazil, Argentina and other South American barely succeeding states, lightness of skin, just like cream, will always rise to the top. But as the stooges are wondering what went wrong, their handlers will be wailing no more. Because things will pan out in other white countries just as they will here, the one major road block to Jews fulfilling their destiny of "becoming a light unto nations" will be out of the way. The peak of human achievement that could only be attained by whites and then shared with the rest of the world will be well on its way to existing only in  old computer files named "lost civilisations". People will wonder about these people such as people do now about the Indian Aryans, the Sumerians, the Greeks and the Romans. And no-one will be visiting the stars.