Blinded by hubris and delusions of grandeur, the UN has disastrously ignored its own policy of Fabianism (the same treacherous gradualism of many socialist parties who advocate the stealth of a cat moving toward a doomed bird) and has exposed its true colours for all to see.
The UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) represents a giving up of over seventy years of pretence that the UN was not designed right from the start with World Government as its ultimate aim. The GCM is indeed so obviously destructive of national sovereignty that even our own Lib/Lab governments which normally vie for the position of teacher's pet at the school of globalisation will not have a bar of it - for at least the time being - preferring to join with a small band of other "xenophobes" (as the Sydney Morning Herald would have it) which includes the US, Poland, Austria, the Czech Republic , Hungary, Slovakia and Israel (which will take immigrants from anywhere as long as they are Jewish),
Justin Castro, sorry, Trudeau, Canada's Prime Lunatic, who claims that his country has "no core identity" and that there is no longer a "mainstream" Canada, but in its place, the "world's first postnational country" of course thinks the compact is a wonderful idea. Similarly, the New Zealand government would like to know what could possibly go wrong with handing over its immigration policy to an international behemoth.
Of the European countries willing to adopt the agreement, a political faultline is cleaving through them. In Belgium, for example, a yellow vest contagion recently broke out, but here the primary cause of violent protests was Belgium's being amenable to the agreement. The UN's timing in trying to foist this compact on the western world (as usual, it will only be the West which will be the bunnies in this one way agreement) is curious given it is coming at the same time as nationalism, in spite of decades of being told it is dirty word, is erupting at a pace and level in many of the countries, victims of mass third world immigration, unprecedented since World War Two.
Is this extraordinary grab for global power at this particular time a recognition that time is no longer on the side of a world government patiently waiting in the wings? What we are now seeing could well be the end-game of the globalists, realising that it is now or never, that if nationalism is allowed to grow and develop much longer, the time may have passed for the rounding up of the sheep into the international corral.
But why this unrest and dissension currently quaking Europe? Do they know something we are not being told? After all, the UN is indefatigable in assuring all and sundry that the GCM is absolutely "non-binding" It is not a treaty. However "it is meant to be the legal framework on which participating countries commit themselves ..."
https://yournz.org/2018/12/01/the-criticism-of-migration-will-be-a-criminal-offense/
How many angels are dancing on the head of this particular pin?
More intriguing, why, if the GCM is non-binding, why cannot the abstainers just humour the UN and go along with it? What's the harm? Could it be that it takes a liar to know a liar? Take the adamant refusal of the US to get roped into this. Why, if it has no effect on domestic legislation? Does the US government know something that the rest of us mugs are not being told? It could be it is reflecting on the weapons-grade bullshit that it has used on its own people. For example, when the 1965 Hart-(((Celler))) Act, superceding the 1924 immigration act stipulating immigration quotas based on ethnic percentages already resident, shabbos goy Ted Kennedy was wheeled out to promise Americans, hand on heart, that fears of the racial mix of the country being altered in any way by this act was totally unfounded. We all know how that turned out.
How about our own homegrown traitors? Those with memories long enough may remember the arrival of the first boat-people in Darwin, the unrest it caused, and our government turning ferociously on those unrested, smearing them with the toxic shit of insults such as "bigots" and the tried and trusted argument-stopper of "racists", and scolding them for their red-kneck stupidity: how could they possibly imagine that a handful of Asian refugees was going to upset the racial status quo?
We know how that turned out as well. It was of course simply the thin edge of the wedge that would eventually widen the damage into full-blown Asianisation.
Perhaps this might be a small part of what is so upsetting the "far right" in Europe: (from the compact) " ... no state can address immigration alone ..." Why ever not? States such as Japan, China, Israel, and Thailand, to name a few, seem to be doing a bang-up job of addressing immigration alone.
One senses desperation here. This stinks of the same MO as the global warming scam. Remember, no state acting alone can save the planet. But whereas polar bears floating away on ice cubes persuasion contained at least a crumb of credibility - after all we all share the same atmosphere - the plea for immigration to become an internationally controlled affair is based on a premise of pure bullshit. Of course, every single country has the ability to conduct an immigration policy on a fair and humane basis without the meddling of the UN. Christ knows, we've been doing it for the best part of a century.
Curious also, in spite of UN assurance that the continuance of state sovereignty is just as uppermost in the minds of the compact's drafters as the rights of immigrants, the document is peppered with mentions of these rights but not a lot is said about how agreement to the GCM will not infringe on national immigration policies. Conversely, a hell of a lot is said about how individual states will have to learn to toe the line.
The whole of Tel Aviv could not produce more chutzpah than the drafters of this "compact" have blown out of their arses. Take this, for example: just one way in which nations grown tired with their own sovereignty will be expected to fall into line: They will need to "promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including by sensitising and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants."
 |
| WORLD GOVERNMENT IN EMBRYO |
Mere criticism of immigration is already on its way to becoming "hate speech" and a criminal offense. (See above link to the video. Note also how the EU dictatorship is shaping up as an arm of the UN. What next? Could it be what "conspiracy theorists" have been tipping for years - that NATO will become the enforcer of the UN?)
But at least, if this black flag of tyranny ever does get planted here, it shouldn't come as a complete shock because we've already tasted a small sample of how the media are ordered to support policy via government edict. Former Australian Prime Minister and leading traitor, Bob Hawke, once boasted about how he'd engineered an agreement with the Australian media whereby, as much as possible, the issue of immigration would be ignored by print and electronic media. In this way, those who hadn't yet woken up to the bipartisan policy scam ensuring that the Australian people would never be allowed a say in the matter of their own racial replacement could be pretty much guaranteed to stay that way.
And naturally, Australians were fated to be forever locked out of this particular political process because our self-appointed superiors knew exactly what would happen if they weren't, given that every survey ever conducted showed that around seventy percent of the population was against mass immigration and multiculturalism. Imagine that! They actually wanted to keep their country.
Please think on this the next time you find yourself thinking of how lucky you are to be living in a "democracy." The system we are in fact living with has been termed "Democratic Tyranny" and the GCM represents one giant leap for tyrants. Unless something truly spectacular happens we are hurtling toward a future accurately described by the great prophet, George Orwell, as "a boot stamping on a human face - forever".
No comments:
Post a Comment