The cat's out of the bag. It's huge - more like a mountain-lion, and it's shrieking like a sunburnt vampire. It is exceedingly curious though that, apart from a few brave exceptions, notably Piers Akerman of the Sydney Daily Telegraph and Andrew Bolt of the Melbourne Sun Herald, the controlled media gives the strong impression of hardly having noticed. It took the fine, upstanding, oh so politically correct Sydney Morning Herald almost a week after Ackerman’s piece appeared to offer a mild, so-what kind of approach to possibly the greatest scandal since Watergate (hence ‘Climategate’)
So one really needs to go the internet, our one true source of free information, to find that, due to some shrewd computer hacking, the 'science' of anthropogenic global warning, , can now be safely stored right alongside the science of tea-leaf reading where so many have always strongly suspected it belonged.
A massive 61 MB of file was lifted from the data base of Britain’s University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) and placed on the net for the world to see. The CRU provides data to the British Meteorological Office which in turn is one of the three main engine-rooms churning out material that forms the basis of the assessment that global warming is a threat to life as we know it. It is this assessment relied upon by the UN's climate change science body. The UN must be licking its collective lips at the prospect of a catastrophe so great that only that great humanitarian body is up to the task of addressing, and no doubt sees itself as riding cavalry-like to the rescue. Unfortunately for these global hustlers, the cavalry is now looking uncannily like Custer’s last stand.
The leading villain in all this is one Doctor Phil Jones who has been stood down while what is being presented as a misunderstanding can be sorted out. Important to note is that accusations of fraudulently doctored information and statistics have not been denied, but weakly defended as being ‘taken out of context’.
The smoking gun is the emails that flowed between Jones and his fellow hoax spinners in an air of increasing desperation as they try to fit conflicting evidence to their theory like a frustrated moron thumping square pegs into round holes. Here is a brief sample:
From: Phil Jones. To: Many. Nov 16, 1999
"I've just completed Mike's Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
From Phil Jones To: Michael Mann (Pennsylvania State University). July 8, 2004
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
From: Kevin Trenberth (US National Center for Atmospheric Research). To: Michael Mann. Oct 12, 2009
"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't... Our observing system is inadequate"
From: Phil Jones. To: Many. March 11, 2003
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
From Phil Jones. To: Michael Mann. Date: May 29, 2008
"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise."
From: Michael Mann. To: Phil Jones and Gabi Hegerl (University of Edinburgh). Date: Aug 10, 2004
"Phil and I are likely to have to respond to more crap criticisms from the idiots in the near future." (Quotes courtesy of Telegraph.Co.UK 23/11/09)
The picture we like to have of scientists is one of dedicated truth-seekers of high integrity. It was this unalloyed devotion to truth plus the scientific method based on theory supported by repeatable experiment – empiricism – that lifted us from the darkness of superstition and ignorance. What could possible motivate scientists to so sully this image and bring it into world-wide disrepute? The latest issue of On Target (11/12/09) disseminated by the Australian League of Rights provides a very mercenary answer:
‘Consider the case of Phil Jones, the director of the CRU and the man at the heart of climategate. According to one of the documents hacked from his centre, between 2000 and 2006 Mr. Jones was the recipient (or co-recipient) of some $19 million worth of research grants, a six-fold increase over what he'd been awarded in the 1990s.
Why did the money pour in so quickly? Because the climate alarm kept ringing so loudly:
The louder the alarm, the greater the sums. And who better to ring it than people like Mr. Jones, one of its likeliest beneficiaries?
Thus, the European Commission's most recent appropriation for climate research comes to nearly $3 billion, and that's not counting funds from the EU's member governments. In the U.S., the House intends to spend $1.3 billion on NASA's climate efforts, $400 million on NOAA's, and another $300 million for the National Science Foundation. The states also have a piece of the action, with California—apparently not feeling bankrupt enough—devoting $600 million to their own climate initiative. In Australia, alarmists have their own Department of Climate Change at their funding disposal.
And all this is only a fraction of the $94 billion that HSBC Bank estimates has been spent globally this year on what it calls "green stimulus"—largely ethanol and other alternative energy schemes—of the kind from which Al Gore and his partners at Kleiner Perkins hope to profit handsomely.’ (Originally from Wall Street Journal 30/11/09)
OK, that explains the corruption of scientists, but what explains the motivation of those who not only have no qualms about it, but are happy to see this corruption? Moreover, why do these shadow-dwellers go to such lengths to suppress evidence that does not support their apocalyptic vision? One may also ask why the 31,000 scientists including over 9,000 PhDs who emphatically disagree with anthropogenic warming have been effectively exiled? (http://www.petitionproject.org/) A one-word answer will suffice: POWER.
We are now witnessing the end-game, the sprint to the finish line, the dash for the cash. World government can no longer be conveniently relegated to conspiracy theory. It is happening; it is here. The finishing touches will be put on it at Copenhagen. Supposedly man induced global warming will be the rationale (what possible use are puny nation-states when the entire planet is threatened with destruction?) If in any doubt as to what will transpire at Copenhagen, one only need view the video presentations (on the net) of Lord Christopher Monckton, a global warming authority and one of the few who have taken the trouble to read the fine print of the agreement to be signed at Copenhagen. Apparently though there is no real need to delve into the murkier sections of the document as no effort is made to hid the word GOVERNMENT – singular, not plural as in national governments. The signing of this agreement will be nothing less than the surrendering of national sovereignty. Once locked in, which is the operative term as it will be exceedingly difficult if not impossible to escape. All manner of EU type meddling will begin occurring in national affairs with the added bonus of it being on a global scale.
Take as much comfort as you can from the Senate’s rejection of the introduction of an Emissions Trading Scheme (leading of course to the rejection of Malcolm Turnbull as Opposition leader). It will be cool comfort at best. Our world-stage-prancing, self-agrandising Prime Minister will still be winging his way to Copenhagen, albeit bereft of the personal victory which he intended to wear as a halo, but fired with his usual self-worshipping self-righteousness nonetheless. He will sign whatever agreement is placed before him. In fact it is not too much of a stretch of the imagination to picture him elbowing his fellow masters of the universe out of the way so he can be the first to sign. Once again, refer to the videos of Lord Christopher Monckton in order to realise what this signature will mean. Bearing in mind that a form of international ‘government’ will be engendered by this pact, if it decrees that signatories to the agreement are obliged to introduce a form of ETS, probably only different in name to the one that was just rejected locally, then that is what will be done. Beware politicians who say ‘never ever’. Remember the GST. That was something that in all probability was also foisted on us from outside, from above, for example from the International Monetary Fund or the World Trade Organisation. And who can forget the crushing of Tasmania’s state rights by a brutal abuse of the constitution which saw the foreign affairs section twisted grotesquely out of shape by construing it to apply to a treaty signed with the UN? When world government eventually appears fully formed, it will only be a surprise to those who have not been monitoring its stealthy but beaver-like construction for many years.
For those who care (unfortunately most don’t, because, hey, if you can’t trust the government, who can you trust?) there are at least two salutary warnings to be heeded in this whole sick, sorry affair. The first is that there is nothing so low that that the one worlders and their global warming shock troops will not stoop to gain their objectives. The second is that the controlled mass media can now be seen to be completely irrelevant. If a story as big as this cannot be seen as news, one can only conclude that what is presented to us as news is simply that which fits the ideology of those who control the media, who in turn are controlled by a certain section of humanity whose blood pressure would not rise one single point if the rest of humanity burned in hell.
It is about this point in a horror story such as this that the audience is advised to ‘be afraid; be very afraid’. The problem here though is that for horror on this kind of scale, fear is an entirely useless emotion. For those who value freedom in Australia, anger may prove to be far more useful.
POST SCRIPT: In regard to the general perception that Copenhagen was a colossal debacle and that absolutely nothing was achieved, please see the following.
Final Copenhagen Text Includes Global Transaction Tax
Obama set to bypass Congress and approve massive transfer of wealth to world government
by Paul Joseph Watson
The final Copenhagen draft agreement which was hammered out in the early hours of Friday morning includes provisions for a global tax on financial transactions that will be paid directly to the World Bank, as President Obama prepares to bypass Congress by approving a massive transfer of wealth from America into globalist hands.
As Lord Monckton, Alex Jones and others warned, the notion that the globalists would achieve nothing at Copenhagen has likely been a ruse all along. The elite look set to ram through the lion’s share of their agenda, which would include a massive global government tax...
...
Monckton told the Alex Jones Show last week that the initial secretive draft version of the Copenhagen agreement represented a global government power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” and mandated the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.
Monckton said that the new world government outlined in the treaty would be handed powers to, “Tax the American economy to the extent of 2 percent GDP, to impose a further tax of 2 percent on every financial transaction….and to close down effectively the economies of the west, transfer your jobs to third world countries.”
No comments:
Post a Comment