Here's a breath of fresh air: a politically incorrect political party. Given the events occurring in various parts of the the world including ours, it may just encapsulate an idea whose time has come. Naturally it's receiving the full blast of vitriolic vile that supplants reasoned argument for the intellectually challenged whose brains are still glowing from a full wash and spin cycle, but this of course should be worn as a badge of honour. The Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA), as are similar but more aggressive, street-wise organisations eschewing parliamentary politics, is an essential counter balance to the growing strength, confidence and hostility of Islam in Australia. (A desire to avoid a gag reflex as well as a feeling of being violated prevents the use of the term, 'Australian Islam' as there is nothing Australian about Islam and never will be. Islam is diametrically opposed to everything for which Australia stands. )
Apologists for Islam, leftists and fellow travelling masters of the dark art of duplicity are indefatigable in pointing out the existence of warm, cuddly 'moderate Islam'. Let it be emphatically stated, no such creature exists. It is as mythical as a mermaid. In reality, 'moderate Islam' is either one of two things: it is either made up of the lackadaisical type who doesn't take Islam that seriously and probably hasn't read the Koran and so is not a real Muslim but an apostate and therefore fair game for ISIS decapitation squads, or it is the second much more dangerous variety. This is the type who cleaves to the advice given in the Koran to use all manner of deception in dealing with the infidel when to do otherwise would be disadvantageous. It's a numbers game. When the numbers are still relatively low it makes good sense to keep a low profile and endeavour to appear as meek and as inoffensive as possible, but as the numbers increase with a proportionate increase in power and in inverse proportion to to the craven appeasement of the host population, true colours begin to be flown. Instead of reacting to the latest atrocity perpetuated by 'extremist' Muslims with the usual deafening silence - a collective no comment - mummers of approval begin to be heard.
With Donald Trump poised to become the next US president simply be emulating the boy who could plainly see the emperor was stark, bollocky naked, the ALA may similarly rattle our own antipodean cage by recognising the reality of the blistering hatred Muslims harbour for infidels and the insanity of importing more and more of a fifth column. We watch like rabbits caught in headlights the unhurried, methodical construction of a time-bomb in our midst.
The ALA is a well organised, well funded party poised to run candidates for the senate from every state and territory in the next federal election. This is a sensible strategy given that it is much easier to win a senate seat than a seat in the house. Small party candidates have been known to be successful with two percent on the primary vote and even less.
If Kirralie Smith, who will be standing as a senate candidate for NSW, is a fair representation of the general calibre of ALA candidates - and there is nothing to suggest she isn't - the party will not be lacking in fire-power. She is young, attractive, personable, well educated and an accomplished public speaker.
The party was only launched in October last year in Perth. On hand to do the honours was Geert Wilders, the Dutch MP and outspoken critic of Islam in Europe (and so naturally has his life preserved by 24 hour police guard). As the situation in Europe spirals into catastrophe courtesy of an exponentially ramped up Muslim invasion and brings the very continued existence of Europe into question, Wilders is one of the heavy-hitters, along with Marine Le Pen, of nationalist figures to whom more and more people will be turning for salvation. Wilder's infatuation with Israel though may not be to the liking of all who oppose Islamisation.
The ALA's platform, although nationalist-lite for understandable reasons of political pragmatism, contains much that would appeal to the great mass of Australian people who are effectively disenfranchised by Lib/Lab bipartisan agreement on the really important issues being of no concern to the people most affected by them. Multiculturalism is of course the prime example. Not once have the Australian people been given to opportunity to voice an opinion on a policy that has changed the country beyond recognition to someone just waking from a thirty year coma. Where the hell am I? Instead, it has been a top-down revolution forced on the body politic like spinach on a four year old. The ALA would like to see Multiculturalism scrapped. And not before time with even the likes of David Cameron and Angela Merkel admitting Multiculturalism is a complete and utter failure (this however did not prevent Frau Merkel from importing over one million Muslims in the last year).
Although seeing Multiculturalism as something dead for some time and for all our sakes would someone please remove it, the ALA has no problem with a multi-ethnic Australia. This is a realistic acceptance of a fait accompli. It also sees the country as a propositional nation or through a prism of what's been called civic nationalism. Carefully avoided is the once common definition of a nation in terms of race and blood. Indeed, race, is avoided as much as it would be by those who see it as a 'social constuct' - at least until someone of a certain race is being seen to be discriminated against. Although this would be a bitter pill to swallow for more hard core nationalists, it is again really just political pragmatism. You don't want to scare the horses.
There is a hole though in the platform wide enough to drive those horses through and that is the complete head-in-the-sand avoidance of Asianisation, as though there is only one way to lose a country - the Islamic way. Asianisation is an obvious far greater threat and given that the present trend is not in some way derailed we are well on track to be, as Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore once predicted, the poor, white trash of Asia.
Notwithstanding the opinion expressed previously on this blog that voting is the 'democratic' equivalent of pissing in the wind, a vote for this party is probably better than just getting your name marked off. They stand a very good chance of getting at least one senator elected and this one senator, although obviously not able to actually touch the levers of power, could become a lightening rod as Pauline Hanson once did and as well become a voice for the great silent majority. The groundswell of support that lifted Hanson did not mysteriously disappear or die off; it is still out there, still quietly smouldering and just needing to be energised by a real chance of something, anything deflecting their course from the brink of the abyss.
No comments:
Post a Comment