SYDNEY SET TO FALL

HONG KONG ...  NO SORRY, IT'S HURSTVILLE - A TYPICAL SYDNEY SUBURB

Here's something to cause liberal/leftists to get either hard or wet: the Daily Telegraph of January 19 gleefully reported that "[i]n just over 10 years more Sydneysiders will be speaking a foreign language at home than those speaking English". And here's a surprise: "... in the five years from the previous census to the latest one, the number-one language spoken (apart from English) changed to Mandarin from Arabic which is now number two". Well, it would be a surprise if you weren't aware that Australia is fated to become a Chinese colony, with more and more Chinese flooding in every day under a variety of schemes and visas obviously designed to confuse those not paying strict attention.

The overseas student visa, for example, is a red-hot number. Getting one of these and studying courses in which generous leeway is allowed for students whose English is a little sub-standard (or even non-existent) because of our education industry's addiction to overseas money, gains the student a pole position when deciding to apply for residency and, ultimately, citizenship. And that often translates into yet another member of the Chinese fifth column currently going gang-busters in this hopelessly naive country.

The prospect of English becoming a minority language in this city (which of course is a euphemism for Whites becoming a minority) so thrills the staff of the Telegraph that part of the editorial of the same date weighs in with this: "... few cities on Earth are more diverse than Sydney. At the same time fewer cities on Earth are as cohesive, safe, welcoming and socially secure [whatever that means] as Sydney". (Italics mine). Obviously, Telegraph people need to get out more, and perhaps initiate conversations with the victims of multiculturalism: the native Whites of Sydney. They would soon realise exactly how cohesive and welcoming Australians are these days.

Or perhaps the scribblers peering through their rose-coloured lenses should stop for a moment to muse on the need for a Human Rights Tribunal ever ready to pounce on those alleged to be mean to people of colour (it, of course, is a one-way street and the HRT would never rouse itself if a mere White was being vilified) or the beefing up of the Racial Discrimination Act with section 18C. Possibly, they may spare a minute to ponder the fact that the term, "racist" hurled about so freely now, whenever a multiculturalist is in danger of losing an argument to a nationalist, was unheard of fifty years ago. It was then only a term used by Communists from whom today's Cultural-Marxists learnt it. It was also back then that Australia was a truly cohesive society, so cohesive that no one ever thought of applying the term to Australia sociologically. Maybe, just maybe, this heavy-handedness is essential for keeping society in Sydney and the rest of Australia "cohesive". Oddly, when Australia was monocultural, that is, a nation in the true sense, a Racial Discrimination Act was not needed, nor a Human Rights Commission soaking up twenty-five million dollars of tax-payers money every year. Why was that?

Maybe, if Telegraph reporters actually got out and around to speak with members of the working class, to whom their rag is aimed, with its never-ending childish puns apparently thought of as being enjoyed by those they so vastly underestimate, they may find that things are not quite as rosy as they imagine in this great city. They may even come to appreciate the explosive nature of the resentment bubbling under a very a thin crust.

Exactly why would those being racially replaced, and, moreover,  waking up to the fact, still be "welcoming". Just how stupid does the Telegraph imagine Australians to be? How does it imagine, for instance, that Australians are so wallowing in the joys of multiculturalism as they watch night after night televised reports of pathologically greedy Chinese, organised in syndicates, stripping supermarket shelves of baby formulae in order to send it back to China at a two hundred percent mark-up. Possibly, it would be safe to surmise that they are not entirely happy at seeing food stolen from the mouths of babes. Interviews with Australian mothers desperately trying to locate formulae for their babies is heart-rending. But why should the enterprising Chinese care about the dopey round-eyes? That's not the reason they came here. They come here for the same reason their ancestors came here during the gold-rushes: the abundant opportunities for people as enterprising as them to make easy money - free of any silly, sentimental qualms.

It's also debatable that Australians are really thrilled about a continuing influx of people who hate us and our way of life and aren't all that concerned when the more unhinged of their brethren take it into their heads to mow us down on streets and footpaths. Yes, I'm referring to the adherents of that well-known religion of peace. A "welcoming" society? If you happen to be a White native of this country and decide to venture into one of the ghettos carved out of the country by these peace-lovers, check to see how welcomed you feel. Old residents of these once all-White areas found out to their sorrow and cost how, not only unwelcome they were, but also how offers-that-couldn't-be-refused were attracted by their reluctance to move. However, Australians are considered to be so sub-par of intellect that they are incapable of extrapolating from what is happening in Western Europe in order to preview their future unless current trends are reversed.

Even people not living in Australia would have some idea of how the majority of the population hugs the coasts of this huge continent. They would, therefore, have an inkling of how much our glorious beaches mean to us. A long-standing Australian tradition is of leaving one's possessions on the beach while taking a dip in the surf confident in the knowledge their possessions would still be there when they returned. It wasn't fail-safe, but close to it. That is now changing, courtesy of "youths of African appearance" who have become beach-combers, and not in the usually accepted sense. Reports have surfaced of these youths operating in gangs scouring the beaches for the low-hanging fruit of wallets and purses and other goodies that can be picked up while their owners are absent. Whenever other sun-bathers have tried to intervene, they have been brutally bashed.

Incidentally, it was our beach culture being abused that was the trigger for the so-called Cronulla riot. On that occasion, Australian youths became fed up with so-called Lebanese-Australians sexually harassing and insulting Australian girls and with the unthinkable crime of a life-saver (a revered volunteer lifeguard with a long tradition) being beaten up - a bit of a rip in our cohesiveness that day.

But back to the African-appearing youths: these have ridden in on one of our more recent waves of enrichment but have shown an amazing ability to make up for lost time. Just yesterday (January 22), in fact, it was reported in The Daily Telegraph that a "[p]olice have arrested 10 members of a youth gang they believe attacked and robbed at least five people around railway stations across Western Sydney".

"The gang, made up of youths of African appearance, calls itself the "BMF" (Black Mutha F ...[uckers]) and carried out the assaults over two weeks in the Blacktown area, [appropriately enough] according to police."

However, in the same article, Western Sydney University criminologist, Michael Kennedy, took issue with the word, "Gang" used in the article's headline. Splitting a semantic hair, he wanted to assure Sydneysiders that, "[t]here is not a gang problem in the Sydney Sudanese community at all".

This bullshit started in Melbourne where Africans somehow became ensconced before the problems they brought with them began manifesting in other areas which now include Queensland. Marauding packs of "youths of African appearance" have been terrorising our southern neighbours for some time now, to the point that many Melbourne citizens state that they are now too afraid to venture out at night and consequently restaurants began feeling the pinch. There have been several savage battles between Africans apparently split along tribal lines.

The incredibly politicised and politically correct Victorian police, marching to the tune of an extremely left-wing State government, have done little to stem the violence. The marauders continue marauding with virtual impunity. Instead of doing what is their reason for existence, Victorian police have been using up an obscene amount of energy trying to convince the people they are sworn to protect that there really isn't anything to worry about because Melbourne simply does not have a gang problem.

The next time someone is mugged or simply beaten up for the fun of it, it is apparently imagined that great solace will be provided to the victim in knowing he isn't suffering at the hands of a gang - just a collection of Blacks who've come together on an ad hoc basis to dispense an ad hoc arse-kicking.

Here, in fact, we have imported into our country - our Shangri-la of social cohesion - "the most successful example of multiculturalism ever" - "South African style violent home invasions, car-jackings and armed robberies", as described more honestly by Miranda Devine in her column in today's Telegraph (January 23)

Of course, the real test of our cohesiveness is yet to come. That will be when our atheistic Chinese communists face-off against our fanatically religious Muslims. Now they will be "interesting times" as the Chinese curse goes. Saying, may you live in interesting times, is a bit like pointing the bone at someone.