That Tarrant was a deluded fool who has not only not furthered white interests but significantly damaged them is highlighted in his seventeen-minute live-streamed video when he refers to the carnage he has just inflicted at the Al Noor mosque as a "fire-fight" - an odd description of the wholesale slaughter of unarmed victims by a man armed with an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle. When he's offered the opportunity for a real fight, he apparently declines; how else to explain his being taken by a mere two uniformed coppers armed only with handguns versus his arsenal of military-style weapons? He evidently was not willing to die himself, so lack of ticker could possibly be added to the glaring fault of delusions of grandeur. In his manifesto, regarding who was going to solve the problem of mass Muslim immigration into Western countries, he asks, if not him, then who?
An explosion of murder - somewhere in the world - was, unfortunately as predictable as it is tragic. It is the result of stifling and delegitimizing any disagreement with a unilateral world-view. The old left/right political paradigm is well past its use-by date. Now the two antithetical world views are globalists and nationalists and, at this stage, respectively, winners and losers and, as Springsteen sings, "don't get caught on the wrong side", as millions of "right-thinking" people fear. And why wouldn't the globalists be winning? After all, it's a fairly formidable line-up: all Western governments, all major corporations, all news media, the entertainment industry, the education industry and all the brain-washed dupes who prefer to have their thinking done for them.
This A team has deliberately forced the discourse, if there is such a thing, into cross purposes. It willfully misrepresents nationalists as "white supremacists", "xenophobes", "bigots" and "evil racists" completely ignoring what nationalists fear and loath, that is, the replacement of white populations around the world with third-worlders leading inexorably and eradication of white people. (It's even a stretch to be calling Tarrant a white supremacist after he openly admits his admiration for Pakistanis in their natural setting. It's only their presence in Western countries he finds abhorrent.) What is so outlandish about that claim. What else can result from the flooding of formerly all-white countries with fast-breeding none whites - as opposed to the below replacement white birth rate caused by the leftist (globalist) out-branch of feminism - and the relentless promotion of miscegenation?
Who could really blame Tarrant, not for what he saw as a solution, but the conclusion he reached. Rest assured, the number of people reaching the same conclusion is growing daily thanks to their being able to discover truth, as Tarrant correctly observed, on the only place possible - the internet. So why should it be so shocking, so surprising even, that a loser with a few screws missing has cut loose? Even now, there must be many who have correctly recognised that their fears and longings will never be taken account of in our supposedly democratic system. Robbing entire segments of population of freedom of speech, supposedly one of the central tenets of democracy, can only lead to one conclusion and that, of course, is that the only avenue left open is one of direct action - of some kind.
Even before Christchurch, the screws were being tightened with internet giants such as Amazon, for example, refusing to sell books thought to be promoting "white supremacism" (again, read, white nationalism), and Google and Facebook - after a quiet, but not so quiet as to be not overheard, tete a tete between frumpy Frau Merkel and Jew, Mark Zuckerberg - were deplatforming "hate-speech" (expressions of white nationalism). Now, however, a power drill will be taken to the tightening of the screws, driving white nationalism even further underground where pressure can only build. The NZ government, for instance, although admittedly still off balance, dazed and confused, is threatening to punish people with ten-year sentences for merely saving the video live-streamed by the shooter to their hard-drives.
In Australia which is collectively cringing because Tarrant is a natural born Australian citizen, politicians are competing to show who is the most hairy-chested when it comes to putting pressure on social media eliminate postings by "white supremacists", the definition of which is slowly but surely being expanded to include anyone critical of multiculturalism and mass third world invasion. In other words, the soft tyranny masquerading as democracy is transforming into a harder version.
If any confirmation was needed of the antics of the media, the way the massacre was covered was surely it. Balance in journalism, although probably largely absent since the time news first started being reported, was shown to be a hopelessly idealistic notion. Even mild-mannered conservatives began being blamed as instigators of what had occurred, while of course anyone who'd ever criticised mass immigration was labeled as a neo-nazi only one bullet away from mass murder. Some would be no doubt be wishing that the science fiction concept of pre-crime enforcement was instead science fact - better to lock up all suspected of harbouring deadly fantasies before they could be acted upon.
Anyone watching television was being encouraged to cry along with the good folk of New Zealand in tear-stained, hand wringing soul-searching. "Inclusivity" is being turbo-charged to the point of absurdity with even the Christchurch Crusaders hinting at a name change to ingratiate New Zealanders still further with their Muslims who in all likelihood still secretly hate their guts
"We are all Muslims now", some fool claimed, plagiarising with variation from the slogan of Je suis Charlie that was launched after the Charlie Hebdo mass murder in Paris in 2015 - by Muslims.
And speaking of the elephant-like presence in the room of murders of non-Muslims. this brings us to another important point because it seems that as well as balance being fed into the shredder, perspective has gone right along with it. Yes, the murder of fifty innocents is terrible but how does it look when compared with the body-count of "infidels" notched up by Muslims and invariable down-played and excused by globalist Islamophiles? This year alone, and it's only March, the total of non-Muslims destroyed by adherents to the religion of peace stands at 2,089 from 374 attacks in 32countries. (https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30) This clearly puts us on track to either equal or surpass 2017's total of 84,000 killed around the world by Islamist groups. (Figure kindly provided by Miranda Devine of the [Sydney] Daily Telegraph citing the Global Extremism Monitor.)
However, one could be forgiven for concluding that what happened in Christchurch was the first of its particular kind. This though would be a mistake. In February 1994, Doctor Baruch Goldstein, marched into a mosque in Hebron and offed 29 peaceful worshippers with gunfire. The crucial difference though between Christchurch and Hebron was in the aftermath. Whereas conditioned Westerners are reacting to last Friday's atrocity with shock, disbelief, sadness and sympathy, "[f]or many far-right Israeli Jews and especially the settler movement Goldstein was a martyr to the cause of religious Zionism. His grave in a ceremonial plaza overlooking the Palestinian town became a place of pilgrimage and celebration ... " (https://mondoweiss.net/2013/07/murderer-baruch-goldstein/)
And speaking of our Jewish overlords, there is an odd omission from Tarrant's long, rambling manifesto. Although he appears to be au fait with most of the grievances shared throughout the alt-right: the Great Replacement, white genocide, the new world order and world government waiting in the wings, only once does he mention the Jews who openly boast of their being the masterminds behind the multiculturalism so destructive to Western civilization. He seems completely clueless though about the devastation wrought by Jews on non-Jews throughout history in their never-ending war against the rest of humanity. Tarrant claims he is no anti-Semite. He simply lumps Jews in with Muslims in that "[a] jew living in Israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people.” Just how red-pilled is Tarrant? One suspects the pill he popped was several shades less red than the blood he spilled.
No comments:
Post a Comment